The NCAA’s Proposed 5-in-5 Rule
NCAA’s Proposed 5-in-5 Rule: What It Means for College Athletes and Recruiting
If you follow college sports or are an athlete dreaming of competing at the next level, you’ve probably heard buzz about the NCAA’s proposed “5-in-5 Rule.” This potential change could reshape how student-athletes plan their college careers, their recruiting timelines, and even how coaches manage rosters.
In this post, we’ll break down what the 5-in-5 Rule is, how it changes NCAA eligibility rules, who it impacts, and what it could mean for the college recruiting process.
What Is the NCAA 5-in-5 Rule?
Currently, NCAA athletes are allowed four seasons of competition that must be used within a five-year eligibility window.
That five-year clock gives room for:
- A redshirt year (where athletes don’t compete to preserve eligibility while they train, recover from injury, or adjust academically)
- Certain waivers for hardship or medical reasons
The proposed 5-in-5 Rule would change all of that.
If passed, student-athletes could play five full seasons within five years — but there would be no traditional redshirt year. Once your eligibility clock starts, those five seasons must be used back-to-back.
Why Is the 5-in-5 Rule Being Proposed?
The NCAA says this change would simplify the eligibility rules for college athletes and remove the complicated redshirt and waiver system. By giving every athlete five full seasons of play, there’s less confusion over who qualifies for exceptions and how waivers are granted.
Potential Benefits of the 5-in-5 Rule
-
More Playing Time for College Athletes
Every player gets an extra full season to compete. This could be especially valuable for athletes in developmental sports, walk-ons, or programs where it takes time to earn starting roles. -
Simplified Eligibility Rules
No more complicated redshirt exceptions or waiting to hear if a waiver is approved. Athletes, coaches, and families would have a clear understanding from the start.
Potential Drawbacks of the 5-in-5 Rule
-
Loss of Flexibility
Without the option to redshirt, athletes recovering from injury or needing extra development won’t have the same safety net. -
Impact on Transfers from Junior Colleges (JUCO) or NAIA
If previous seasons at a JUCO, NAIA, or prep school count toward the five-year limit, some athletes could lose eligibility before they ever compete in NCAA play. -
Legal & Equity Concerns
Ongoing lawsuits (like Pavia v. NCAA) already challenge the fairness of current eligibility rules, especially for JUCO transfers. This proposal could add more complications.
Who Will Be Most Affected by the 5-in-5 Rule?
-
Athletes Wanting a Fifth Year
Players already pushing for a fifth year to finish degrees or keep competing would benefit from guaranteed extra eligibility. -
Junior College Transfers
Under current rules, JUCO seasons count toward the eligibility clock. The 5-in-5 proposal may not change that, meaning transfers still have to manage their seasons carefully. -
Division II Student-Athletes
Division II has its own version of this proposal — allowing up to five seasons in 10 semesters (or 15 quarters) — but with exceptions for medical or personal reasons.
How the 5-in-5 Rule Could Impact College Recruiting
If passed, this rule could shift recruiting strategies:
- Coaches may recruit more aggressively knowing players can contribute for five full years.
- Incoming freshmen may get earlier opportunities to compete without the redshirt year in play.
- Athletes recovering from injuries may need to rethink timelines since there’s no option to pause eligibility.
For student-athletes in the recruiting process, this makes staying healthy, developing quickly, and making strong first impressions even more important.
Final Thoughts: Is the 5-in-5 Rule Good or Bad for College Sports?
The NCAA’s proposed 5-in-5 Rule could provide more opportunities for athletes to compete, but it also removes the flexibility that redshirts have offered for decades. Whether it’s a good move depends on your perspective:
- Athletes ready to contribute early? ✅ Big win.
- Athletes needing extra development or recovery time? ⚠️ Could be a challenge.
As with any NCAA eligibility change, athletes, parents, and coaches should stay informed so they can make the best decisions for their careers.